Home / Companies / AGCO Corporation / 23 Apr 2026
AGCO Corporation: meeting of 23 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
662 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the AGCO Corporation meeting of 23 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 93.9% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,518 vote records from 215 filers. 2 of the 213 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,043 vote records from 659 filers. 52 of the 634 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
501 vote records from 214 filers. 5 of the 212 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding giving stockholders an ability to call for a special stockholder meeting
501 vote records from 214 filers. 138 of the 212 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | Against * | For * |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the AGCO Corporation meeting?
662 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 52 of 634 voted against management (8.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by AGCO Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for AGCO Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing AGCO Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.