Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Antero Midstream Corporation / 5 Jun 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024516 filers reporting

Antero Midstream Corporation: meeting of 5 Jun 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

516 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Antero Midstream Corporation meeting of 5 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 71.6% of reported votes for; 109 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,141 vote records from 171 filers. 21 of the 171 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

87.7% for0.0% against12.3% other12.3% against management171 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

790 vote records from 506 filers. 228 of the 490 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

51.6% for44.7% against3.8% other46.5% against management506 filers65.8% for33.8% against0.4% other34.2% against management280,802,577 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

379 vote records from 168 filers. 2 of the 168 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

98.8% for0.6% against0.6% other1.2% against management168 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management147,247,012 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

392 vote records from 177 filers. 8 of the 177 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

94.9% for4.5% against0.6% other4.5% against management177 filers98.4% for1.5% against0.1% other1.4% against management147,434,807 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management46,560 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *For
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
State Street and SPDRAbstain or withhold *ForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *For
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForAgainst *For
WisdomTreeAbstain or withhold *Against *For
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *For
ThriventForAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withhold *ForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForAgainst *For
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalForAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForAgainst *For
PrincipalForAgainst *For
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst *For
Global XForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst *For
DWSNo reportAgainst *No report
PIMCOForAgainst *For
AllspringNo reportAgainst *No report
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
VanEckForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportAgainst *No report
Neuberger BermanForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Lord AbbettNo reportAgainst *No report
Cohen & SteersNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Antero Midstream Corporation meeting?

516 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 228 of 490 voted against management (46.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Antero Midstream Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Antero Midstream Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Antero Midstream Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 5 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.