Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Arconic Corporation / 25 Jul 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024501 filers reporting

Arconic Corporation: meeting of 25 Jul 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

501 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Arconic Corporation meeting of 25 Jul 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

684 vote records from 484 filers. 60 of the 460 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

82.4% for11.6% against6.0% other13.0% against management484 filers
2

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

229 vote records from 113 filers. 0 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.1% for0.0% against0.9% other0.0% against management113 filers99.4% for0.0% against0.6% other0.2% against management40,624,056 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
3

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

44 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management10 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management23,129 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

315 vote records from 138 filers. 13 of the 137 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

89.1% for8.7% against2.2% other9.5% against management138 filers87.0% for12.4% against0.6% other12.6% against management44,363,880 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other1 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Say-on-pay
VanguardAgainst *
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalFor
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyFor
Franklin TempletonFor
InvescoFor
EquitableFor
Charles SchwabFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *
ProShares and ProFundsFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertFor
J.P. MorganFor
Goldman SachsFor
WisdomTreeFor
PGIM and PrudentialFor
Jackson National fundsFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *
SEIFor
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *
ThriventFor
Lincoln FinancialFor
VoyaAbstain or withhold *
First TrustFor
Russell InvestmentsFor
NationwideFor
Victory CapitalFor
Brighthouse FundsFor
Guggenheim and RydexFor
Columbia ThreadneedleFor
BNY MellonFor
PrincipalFor
Capital Group and American FundsSplit or no vote
Pacific Life fundsFor
Global XFor
TransamericaAgainst *
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *
DWSFor
PIMCOFor
AllspringFor
MassMutualFor
VirtusFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsFor
Janus HendersonFor
Neuberger BermanFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesFor
BairdFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Arconic Corporation meeting?

501 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Jul 2023. On say-on-pay, 60 of 460 voted against management (13.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Arconic Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Arconic Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Arconic Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 25 Jul 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.