Home / Companies / ARKO Corp. / 5 Jun 2025
ARKO Corp.: meeting of 5 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
200 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ARKO Corp. meeting of 5 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 91.5% of reported votes for; 27 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
936 vote records from 77 filers. 6 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
305 vote records from 200 filers. 27 of the 190 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
156 vote records from 77 filers. 3 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
18 vote records from 8 filers. 2 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
20 vote records from 16 filers. 2 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
120 vote records from 55 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 55 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Split or no vote | Against * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | For | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Principal | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ARKO Corp. meeting?
200 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 27 of 190 voted against management (14.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ARKO Corp. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ARKO Corp.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ARKO Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 5 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.