Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Autodesk, Inc. / 17 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,325 filers reporting

Autodesk, Inc.: meeting of 17 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,325 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Autodesk, Inc. meeting of 17 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 95.1% of reported votes for; 76 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

11,198 vote records from 339 filers. 4 of the 336 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.6% against1.2% other1.2% against management339 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,254 vote records from 1,318 filers. 99 of the 1,284 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 34 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.1% for7.4% against3.6% other7.7% against management1,318 filers94.4% for5.3% against0.3% other5.4% against management207,113,520 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,010 vote records from 338 filers. 12 of the 335 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.9% for3.3% against0.9% other3.6% against management338 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.4% against management70,518,017 reported shares
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

938 vote records from 323 filers. 70 of the 320 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

77.1% for21.1% against1.9% other21.9% against management323 filers81.6% for18.4% against0.0% other18.3% against management61,522,019 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Stockholder proposal requesting amendment to stockholder special meeting right.

986 vote records from 326 filers. 174 of the 323 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

53.1% for46.0% against0.9% other53.9% against management326 filers23.9% for76.1% against0.0% other24.0% against management70,284,754 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 3 filers. 1 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

33.3% for66.7% against33.3% against management3 filers96.2% for3.8% against96.2% against management3,492 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForFor *
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForAgainst *ForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForForForFor *
VirtusForForForFor *
VanEckForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainst
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainst
American BeaconForForForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Autodesk, Inc. meeting?

1,325 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 99 of 1,284 voted against management (7.7%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Autodesk, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Autodesk, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Autodesk, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.