Vote Scores

Home / Companies / California BanCorp / 27 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 202680 filers reporting

California BanCorp: meeting of 27 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

80 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the California BanCorp meeting of 27 May 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 96.0% of reported votes for; 18 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,520 vote records from 78 filers. 1 of the 78 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.7% for0.0% against1.3% other1.3% against management78 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

50.0% for50.0% against0.0% against management2 filers60.3% for39.7% against0.0% against management318,777 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

152 vote records from 78 filers. 0 of the 78 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management78 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5,236,317 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

152 vote records from 78 filers. 35 of the 78 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

53.8% for46.2% against44.9% against management78 filers71.8% for28.2% against28.0% against management5,236,317 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
American CenturyForFor
InvescoForFor
EquitableForFor
Charles SchwabForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor
Goldman SachsForFor
WisdomTreeForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForFor
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEIForFor
T. Rowe PriceForFor
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaForFor
First TrustForFor
NationwideForFor
Victory CapitalForFor
Brighthouse FundsForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForFor
PrincipalForFor
Pacific Life fundsForFor
Global XForFor
AllianceBernsteinForFor
DWSForFor
Harbor FundsForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the California BanCorp meeting?

80 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 2 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by California BanCorp on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for California BanCorp

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing California BanCorp with a meeting date within three days of 27 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.