Home / Companies / California Water Service Group / 29 May 2024
California Water Service Group: meeting of 29 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
438 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the California Water Service Group meeting of 29 May 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 96.2% of reported votes for; 15 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,927 vote records from 132 filers. 1 of the 132 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
611 vote records from 426 filers. 25 of the 414 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
265 vote records from 130 filers. 5 of the 130 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
279 vote records from 136 filers. 5 of the 136 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the California Water Service Group meeting?
438 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 25 of 414 voted against management (6.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by California Water Service Group on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for California Water Service Group
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing California Water Service Group with a meeting date within three days of 29 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.