Home / Companies / CF Industries Holdings, Inc. / 28 Apr 2026
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 28 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
963 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CF Industries Holdings, Inc. meeting of 28 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 96.3% of reported votes for; 22 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
8,394 vote records from 268 filers. 3 of the 266 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,644 vote records from 957 filers. 86 of the 922 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 35 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
763 vote records from 267 filers. 9 of the 265 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
31 vote records from 16 filers. 8 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder approval requirement for excessive golden parachutes
759 vote records from 264 filers. 172 of the 262 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | Against * | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CF Industries Holdings, Inc. meeting?
963 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 86 of 922 voted against management (9.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CF Industries Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CF Industries Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 28 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.