Home / Companies / Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation / 2 Jun 2026
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation: meeting of 2 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,185 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation meeting of 2 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 96.3% of reported votes for; 30 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
12,647 vote records from 321 filers. 2 of the 317 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,049 vote records from 1,178 filers. 52 of the 1,136 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
978 vote records from 320 filers. 10 of the 316 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to adopt shareholder right to act by written consent
948 vote records from 309 filers. 128 of the 305 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
14 vote records from 9 filers. 4 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation meeting?
1,185 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 52 of 1,136 voted against management (4.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 2 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.