Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Culp, Inc. / 27 Sep 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 202464 filers reporting

Culp, Inc.: meeting of 27 Sep 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

64 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Culp, Inc. meeting of 27 Sep 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 96.4% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

441 vote records from 26 filers. 1 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

92.3% for0.0% against7.7% other3.8% against management26 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

103 vote records from 63 filers. 4 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

3 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

90.5% for6.3% against3.2% other6.5% against management63 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 52 filers; three years: 6 filers; 1-yr: 1 filer; : 1 filer; for: 1 filer.

102 vote records from 62 filers. 6 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

3 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

1.6% for0.0% against98.4% other9.8% against management62 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

56 vote records from 26 filers. 0 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

96.2% for0.0% against3.8% other0.0% against management26 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management1,921,707 reported shares
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

56 vote records from 26 filers. 1 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

92.3% for3.8% against3.8% other3.8% against management26 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Goldman SachsNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no vote *For
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Culp, Inc. meeting?

64 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Sep 2023. On say-on-pay, 4 of 62 voted against management (6.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Culp, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Culp, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Culp, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 27 Sep 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.