Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Eastman Chemical Company / 2 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024936 filers reporting

Eastman Chemical Company: meeting of 2 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

936 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Eastman Chemical Company meeting of 2 May 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 96.5% of reported votes for; 21 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

5,952 vote records from 239 filers. 5 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.0% for1.7% against3.3% other2.1% against management239 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,464 vote records from 920 filers. 223 of the 895 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

71.6% for24.9% against3.5% other24.9% against management920 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

594 vote records from 237 filers. 15 of the 234 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.0% for5.9% against2.1% other6.4% against management237 filers99.7% for0.3% against0.0% other0.3% against management67,109,907 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

27 vote records from 14 filers. 3 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

64.3% for21.4% against14.3% other21.4% against management14 filers74.9% for24.9% against0.2% other24.9% against management98,802 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management10 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *For
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *Against *
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForAgainst *For
Federated HermesNo reportAgainst *No report
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsNo reportAgainst *No report
DWSForForFor
PIMCOAgainst *Against *Against *
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
VanEckForAgainst *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo report
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *For
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Eastman Chemical Company meeting?

936 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 223 of 895 voted against management (24.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Eastman Chemical Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Eastman Chemical Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Eastman Chemical Company with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.