Home / Companies / FMC Corporation / 29 Apr 2025
FMC Corporation: meeting of 29 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
762 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the FMC Corporation meeting of 29 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 97.1% of reported votes for; 30 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
7,157 vote records from 225 filers. 3 of the 225 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,189 vote records from 755 filers. 496 of the 733 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
551 vote records from 224 filers. 5 of the 224 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
313 vote records from 66 filers. 4 of the 66 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
798 vote records from 173 filers. 1 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Vote on an advisory stockholder proposal to provide stockholders the right to call a special meeting of...
536 vote records from 220 filers. 142 of the 218 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For | Against * |
| Voya | For | Against * | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * |
| Principal | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | No report |
| MFS | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For | For * |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Virtus | For | Against * | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the FMC Corporation meeting?
762 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 496 of 733 voted against management (67.7%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by FMC Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for FMC Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing FMC Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.