Home / Companies / GitLab Inc. / 17 Jun 2026
GitLab Inc.: meeting of 17 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
457 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the GitLab Inc. meeting of 17 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 70.6% of reported votes for; 59 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
431 vote records from 114 filers. 6 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
628 vote records from 452 filers. 36 of the 419 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
215 vote records from 113 filers. 3 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
14 vote records from 8 filers. 4 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | For | For |
| MFS | No report | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| DWS | No report | For | No report |
| Allspring | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the GitLab Inc. meeting?
457 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 36 of 419 voted against management (8.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by GitLab Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for GitLab Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing GitLab Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.