Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Graham Corporation / 22 Aug 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 202494 filers reporting

Graham Corporation: meeting of 22 Aug 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

94 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Graham Corporation meeting of 22 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 90.8% of reported votes for; 5 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

120 vote records from 37 filers. 3 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

89.2% for0.0% against10.8% other8.1% against management37 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

120 vote records from 87 filers. 1 of the 86 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

96.6% for1.1% against2.3% other1.2% against management87 filers98.1% for1.5% against0.4% other1.5% against management6,982,090 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 78 filers; three years: 11 filers; two years: 1 filer; not applicable: 1 filer.

125 vote records from 92 filers. 12 of the 90 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other13.3% against management92 filers0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other8.8% against management6,953,587 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

61 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management37 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management3,070,021 reported shares
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

67 vote records from 38 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

97.4% for2.6% against2.6% against management38 filers99.2% for0.8% against0.8% against management3,228,936 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForForSplit or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no vote *For
Victory CapitalAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
BNY MellonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Graham Corporation meeting?

94 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 Aug 2023. On say-on-pay, 1 of 86 voted against management (1.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Graham Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Graham Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Graham Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 22 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.