Home / Companies / Hess Corporation / 28 May 2024
Hess Corporation: meeting of 28 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,001 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Hess Corporation meeting of 28 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,466 vote records from 956 filers. 451 of the 905 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 51 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
25 vote records from 19 filers. 13 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
575 vote records from 253 filers. 113 of the 251 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
41 vote records from 24 filers. 1 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
768 vote records from 305 filers. 43 of the 300 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Merger pay |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report |
| American Century | Against * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report |
| Thrivent | Against * | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report |
| First Trust | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report |
| Principal | Against * | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | Split or no vote | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report |
| Global X | For | No report |
| MFS | For | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | Against * |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report |
| DWS | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | For | No report |
| Virtus | For | For |
| VanEck | For | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report |
| American Beacon | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | Against * | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | Against * | No report |
| Baird | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Hess Corporation meeting?
1,001 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 451 of 905 voted against management (49.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Hess Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Hess Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Hess Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 28 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.