Vote Scores

Home / Companies / HighPeak Energy, Inc. / 2 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026171 filers reporting

HighPeak Energy, Inc.: meeting of 2 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

171 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the HighPeak Energy, Inc. meeting of 2 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 69.5% of reported votes for; 46 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

369 vote records from 63 filers. 4 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.5% for0.0% against9.5% other6.6% against management63 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

251 vote records from 169 filers. 114 of the 158 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

25.4% for68.0% against6.5% other72.2% against management169 filers26.1% for73.9% against73.9% against management6,892,283 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 148 filers; three years: 6 filers; not applicable: 2 filers; for: 2 filers; against: 1 filer; 1-year: 1 filer.

255 vote records from 169 filers. 6 of the 158 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.2% for0.0% against98.8% other3.8% against management169 filers0.1% for0.1% against99.8% other0.3% against management7,586,187 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

123 vote records from 63 filers. 0 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management63 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2,689,921 reported shares
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,790 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
FidelityForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
EquitableForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
J.P. MorganNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Goldman SachsNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
WisdomTreeAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
SEIForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
First TrustNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Russell InvestmentsNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
NationwideForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForAgainstForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
PrincipalForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Global XForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
DWSForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
AllspringNo reportSplit or no voteSplit or no voteNo report
MassMutualNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the HighPeak Energy, Inc. meeting?

171 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 114 of 158 voted against management (72.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by HighPeak Energy, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for HighPeak Energy, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing HighPeak Energy, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 2 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.