Home / Companies / International Paper Company / 13 May 2024
International Paper Company: meeting of 13 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
993 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the International Paper Company meeting of 13 May 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 94.5% of reported votes for; 67 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,536 vote records from 240 filers. 3 of the 238 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,542 vote records from 975 filers. 46 of the 943 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 32 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
614 vote records from 238 filers. 11 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
671 vote records from 246 filers. 11 of the 244 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Diversity, equity and inclusion
595 vote records from 234 filers. 86 of the 233 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareowner Proposal Concerning Shareowner Opportunity to Vote on Excessive Golden Parachutes
544 vote records from 228 filers. 126 of the 227 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
64 vote records from 19 filers. 7 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the International Paper Company meeting?
993 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 46 of 943 voted against management (4.9%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by International Paper Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for International Paper Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing International Paper Company with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.