Vote Scores

Home / Companies / IonQ, Inc. / 17 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025488 filers reporting

IonQ, Inc.: meeting of 17 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

488 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the IonQ, Inc. meeting of 17 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 78.8% of reported votes for; 49 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

397 vote records from 116 filers. 3 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

63.8% for0.0% against36.2% other2.6% against management116 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

631 vote records from 484 filers. 274 of the 463 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.

38.4% for56.4% against5.2% other59.2% against management484 filers54.9% for44.7% against0.3% other44.7% against management55,542,161 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

197 vote records from 115 filers. 1 of the 115 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.1% for0.0% against0.9% other0.9% against management115 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management27,971,881 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *For
FidelityForAgainst *For
DimensionalNo reportAgainst *No report
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturySplit or no voteAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonSplit or no voteAgainst *For
InvescoSplit or no voteAgainst *For
EquitableForAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
WisdomTreeSplit or no voteAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteAgainst *For
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaSplit or no voteAgainst *For
First TrustSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonSplit or no voteAgainst *For
PrincipalNo reportAgainst *No report
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst *For
Global XForAgainst *For
TransamericaForAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *No report
DWSSplit or no voteAgainst *For
AllspringSplit or no voteAgainst *For
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForAgainst *For
VanEckForAgainst *For
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No report
BairdNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the IonQ, Inc. meeting?

488 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 274 of 463 voted against management (59.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by IonQ, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for IonQ, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing IonQ, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.