Home / Companies / IonQ, Inc. / 16 Jun 2026
IonQ, Inc.: meeting of 16 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
787 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the IonQ, Inc. meeting of 16 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 60.2% of reported votes for; 111 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
717 vote records from 188 filers. 22 of the 180 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,075 vote records from 779 filers. 431 of the 724 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 55 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
359 vote records from 188 filers. 1 of the 180 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| MFS | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Virtus | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| VanEck | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the IonQ, Inc. meeting?
787 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 431 of 724 voted against management (59.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by IonQ, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for IonQ, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing IonQ, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 16 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.