Home / Companies / Jack in the Box Inc. / 27 Feb 2026
Jack in the Box Inc.: meeting of 27 Feb 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
240 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Jack in the Box Inc. meeting of 27 Feb 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
20 nominees; 84.7% of reported votes for; 16 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,240 vote records from 69 filers. 1 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
540 vote records from 238 filers. 25 of the 221 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
220 vote records from 69 filers. 1 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
217 vote records from 67 filers. 8 of the 65 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
223 vote records from 70 filers. 7 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | No report | Against * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For |
| PIMCO | For | For | For |
| Allspring | No report | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Jack in the Box Inc. meeting?
240 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Feb 2026. On say-on-pay, 25 of 221 voted against management (11.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Jack in the Box Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Jack in the Box Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Jack in the Box Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 27 Feb 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.