Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. / 10 Jun 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024944 filers reporting

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.: meeting of 10 Jun 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

944 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. meeting of 10 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 91.8% of reported votes for; 76 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,404 vote records from 306 filers. 7 of the 305 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.4% for2.0% against0.7% other2.3% against management306 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,558 vote records from 930 filers. 252 of the 906 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

69.0% for27.6% against3.3% other27.8% against management930 filers86.0% for13.9% against0.1% other13.8% against management1,260,205,262 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

763 vote records from 304 filers. 8 of the 303 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for2.3% against0.7% other2.6% against management304 filers99.7% for0.2% against0.1% other0.2% against management524,320,312 reported shares
4

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting additional reporting on plastic packaging, if properly...

637 vote records from 262 filers. 51 of the 261 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

16.8% for80.5% against2.7% other19.5% against management262 filers1.5% for98.3% against0.2% other1.7% against management454,625,342 reported shares
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

99 vote records from 50 filers. 5 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

8.0% for90.0% against2.0% other10.0% against management50 filers0.1% for99.7% against0.2% other0.3% against management64,933,438 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *ForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst *ForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForNo report
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst *ForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *ForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForAgainst *ForNo report
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *ForNo report
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainst *ForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForAgainst *ForNo report
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForNo report
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOAgainst *ForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForFor *
VirtusForForForAgainst
VanEckForAgainst *ForNo report
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainst
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *ForNo report
American BeaconForForForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *ForAgainst
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. meeting?

944 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 252 of 906 voted against management (27.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.