Vote Scores

Home / Families / Harris Associates and Oakmark

Form N-PX · fund family2 filers grouped

Harris Associates and Oakmark

Fund registrants and adviser entities grouped under Harris Associates and Oakmark by this site's alias table

Vote records reported
5,454year to 30 June 2026
Against management
2.1%112 of 5,361 marked votes
Say-on-pay support
95.2%for, of for + against + abstain
Shareholder-proposal support
5.9%for, of for + against + abstain
93.7% for5.5% against0.8% other2.1% against management5,386 votes

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

In its Form N-PX for the year to 30 June 2026, Harris Associates and Oakmark listed 5,454 vote records. Votes against management made up 2.1% of those marked either way (112 of 5,361); the median of the fund families tracked here stood at 7.8%.

Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 7.1%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.

On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 95.2% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median of the fund families tracked here: 88.2%) and it voted for 5.9% of the proposals put forward by security holders (the median of the fund families tracked here: 30.7%).

By category, votes against management were most frequent in SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES (17.9% of 28), SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES (4.9% of 530) and COMPENSATION (3.9% of 491).

It reported 454.7 million shares out on loan at record dates, 1.49% of the shares it held or had lent across the meetings it reported. Shares on loan are not voted.

Compared with other filers

Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 60 families with at least 25 vote records in the season.

year to 30 June 2026This familyMedian familyAll filers pooled
Against-management share2.1%7.8%10.6%
Say-on-pay support rate95.2%88.2%86.0%
Shareholder-proposal support rate5.9%30.7%33.9%
Shares on loan, share of shares held1.49%1.53%3.12%
Largest families, year to 30 June 2026Against managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Vanguard20.1%94.1%42.0%
BlackRock and iShares7.5%88.3%11.9%
Fidelity6.0%94.7%27.6%
Dimensional16.4%78.9%57.4%
State Street and SPDR16.9%77.1%50.4%

Of the 5,454 vote records in this filing, 432 carry something the form does not expect: a missing vote source or category, a record with no vote line, a meeting date that cannot be read, or a security identifier this site could not use. They are counted as filed. What is checked

Votes by category

Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.

Category (as the form names it)VotesForAgainstAgainst managementSplit
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS2,4952,450311.6%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES530477244.9%
AUDIT-RELATED35434951.4%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES29151417.9%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS353320.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE54553871.7%
COMPENSATION492466263.9%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE849761881.8%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE488400.0%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE10820.0%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION308220.0%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES11130810.0%
OTHER181170.0%

By season

SeasonVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal supportSplit
year to 30 June 20245,8212.7%99.6%8.5%
year to 30 June 20255,6052.7%98.8%20.2%
year to 30 June 20265,4542.1%95.2%5.9%

Say-on-pay votes against management

Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, Harris Associates and Oakmark voted against management on 18 of the 325 it marked either way (5.5%) in the year to 30 June 2026.

Shareholder proposals it supported

Of 75 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, Harris Associates and Oakmark voted for 7 (9.3%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.

CompanyMeetingProposal
Alphabet Inc.5 Jun 2026Shareholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.5 May 2026Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation
The Wendy's Company20 May 2026S/h proposal - corporate governance
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk19 Dec 2025Amend Articles of Association
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk19 Dec 2025Approve Delegation of Authority for Approval of the 2026 Company Work Plan and Budget
Pirelli & C. SpA25 Jun 2026Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pirelli & C. SpA25 Jun 2026Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Shares on loan

Harris Associates and Oakmark reported 454.7 million shares on loan at record dates against 30.12 billion shares voted: 1.49% of the two together. Median family: 1.53%. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.

Filers grouped under this family

Grouping is by registrant and manager name, from a hand-maintained table. See the methodology.

FilerTypeVote records, year to 30 June 2026
HARRIS ASSOCIATES INVESTMENT TRUSTfund registrant5,105
HARRIS ASSOCIATES L Pinstitutional manager349

Questions

How did Harris Associates and Oakmark vote on executive pay?

In the year to 30 June 2026 Harris Associates and Oakmark reported 501 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 477 were for (95.2%), 24 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 18 of the 325 say-on-pay items it marked either way.

How often does Harris Associates and Oakmark vote against management?

2.1% of the time in the year to 30 June 2026: 112 of the 5,361 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.

Did Harris Associates and Oakmark support shareholder proposals on climate?

In the category ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE it reported 40 votes on proposals from security holders in the year to 30 June 2026 and voted for 0 of them (0.0%). Across every category it voted for 5.9% of security-holder proposals. Filers choose the category for each vote, so the same proposal can sit in different categories in different filings.

Is this the result of the meetings?

No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From the Form N-PX filings of the registrants and managers grouped under this family on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 23 Sep 2026.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings of the filers listed above, read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.