Home / Companies / KRUK SA / 30 Jan 2025
KRUK SA: meeting of 30 Jan 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
27 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the KRUK SA meeting of 30 Jan 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 22 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
60 vote records from 22 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
18 vote records from 3 filers. 3 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
171 vote records from 26 filers. 13 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
220 vote records from 26 filers. 17 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Changes to the Supervisory Board Composition
4 vote records from 3 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against | No report | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against | Against * | No report |
| Fidelity | Against | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Against | No report | No report |
| American Century | Against | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | No report | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against | No report | No report |
| SEI | No report | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | Against | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the KRUK SA meeting?
27 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Jan 2025. On say-on-pay, 3 of 3 voted against management (100.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by KRUK SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for KRUK SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing KRUK SA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Jan 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.