Home / Companies / Lennar Corporation / 9 Apr 2025
Lennar Corporation: meeting of 9 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,094 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lennar Corporation meeting of 9 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 78.4% of reported votes for; 208 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
8,616 vote records from 290 filers. 25 of the 286 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,146 vote records from 1,079 filers. 302 of the 1,035 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 44 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
866 vote records from 289 filers. 12 of the 285 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Report on Diversity Equity and Inclusion Efforts
841 vote records from 281 filers. 89 of the 276 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Vote on a stockholder proposal on an Independent Board Chairman.
839 vote records from 279 filers. 160 of the 274 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Vote on a stockholder proposal requesting disclosure on how the Company intends to reduce greenhouse gas...
832 vote records from 277 filers. 91 of the 273 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
27 vote records from 10 filers. 6 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | Against * | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | Against | For | For | For | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| American Beacon | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lennar Corporation meeting?
1,094 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 302 of 1,035 voted against management (29.2%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lennar Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lennar Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lennar Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 9 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.