Home / Companies / Lucid Group, Inc. / 4 Jun 2024
Lucid Group, Inc.: meeting of 4 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
551 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lucid Group, Inc. meeting of 4 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 84.8% of reported votes for; 57 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,607 vote records from 101 filers. 5 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
696 vote records from 538 filers. 141 of the 501 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
180 vote records from 100 filers. 1 of the 95 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
192 vote records from 107 filers. 51 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For |
| DWS | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lucid Group, Inc. meeting?
551 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 141 of 501 voted against management (28.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lucid Group, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lucid Group, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lucid Group, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 4 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.