Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Marvell Technology, Inc. / 13 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,273 filers reporting

Marvell Technology, Inc.: meeting of 13 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,273 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Marvell Technology, Inc. meeting of 13 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 96.3% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

6,087 vote records from 317 filers. 5 of the 314 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.8% for0.6% against1.6% other1.6% against management317 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,986 vote records from 1,254 filers. 278 of the 1,212 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.

73.8% for22.0% against4.2% other22.9% against management1,254 filers86.0% for13.3% against0.7% other13.5% against management724,463,158 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

762 vote records from 315 filers. 7 of the 312 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.8% for1.6% against1.6% other2.2% against management315 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management281,348,473 reported shares
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To consider and act on one stockholder proposal, entitled "Independent Board Chairman"

732 vote records from 299 filers. 169 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

54.8% for43.8% against1.3% other56.9% against management299 filers18.2% for81.7% against0.0% other18.4% against management279,545,284 reported shares
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

4 vote records from 4 filers. 3 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

25.0% for75.0% against75.0% against management4 filers35.4% for64.6% against38.9% against management214,011 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
State Street and SPDRForAgainst *ForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *ForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *ForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForAgainst *ForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForFor *
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstForAgainst *
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *ForFor *
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForFor *
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForAgainst *ForNo report
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSNo reportForNo reportNo report
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForAgainst *ForFor *
VirtusForAgainst *ForFor *
VanEckForAgainst *ForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForForForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *ForFor *
American BeaconForForForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *ForFor *
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Marvell Technology, Inc. meeting?

1,273 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 278 of 1,212 voted against management (22.9%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Marvell Technology, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Marvell Technology, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Marvell Technology, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 13 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.