Home / Companies / Mattel, Inc. / 29 May 2024
Mattel, Inc.: meeting of 29 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
568 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mattel, Inc. meeting of 29 May 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 97.7% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,631 vote records from 169 filers. 3 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
847 vote records from 557 filers. 28 of the 541 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
362 vote records from 167 filers. 5 of the 167 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
375 vote records from 175 filers. 57 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting additional disclosure regarding political contributions and expenditures.
363 vote records from 169 filers. 36 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | No report | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | No report | For | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Mattel, Inc. meeting?
568 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 28 of 541 voted against management (5.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mattel, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Mattel, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mattel, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 29 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.