Home / Companies / Maximus, Inc. / 12 Mar 2024
Maximus, Inc.: meeting of 12 Mar 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
487 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Maximus, Inc. meeting of 12 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
8 nominees; 97.5% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,063 vote records from 178 filers. 1 of the 176 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
761 vote records from 477 filers. 15 of the 465 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
382 vote records from 175 filers. 4 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal regarding the commission of a third party assessment on the Company s commitment to...
343 vote records from 158 filers. 62 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
32 vote records from 11 filers. 2 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Maximus, Inc. meeting?
487 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 15 of 465 voted against management (3.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Maximus, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Maximus, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Maximus, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 12 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.