Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Merck & Co., Inc. / 26 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20262,131 filers reporting

Merck & Co., Inc.: meeting of 26 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

2,131 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Merck & Co., Inc. meeting of 26 May 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

13 nominees; 96.6% of reported votes for; 76 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

20,752 vote records from 517 filers. 7 of the 515 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.5% for1.0% against0.6% other1.4% against management517 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

4,167 vote records from 2,119 filers. 111 of the 2,063 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 56 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.5% for5.0% against3.5% other5.4% against management2,119 filers96.2% for3.2% against0.5% other3.7% against management2,176,531,603 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,602 vote records from 516 filers. 16 of the 514 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.3% for3.1% against0.6% other3.1% against management516 filers99.3% for0.7% against0.0% other0.6% against management748,015,891 reported shares
4

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on political contributions.

1,504 vote records from 491 filers. 55 of the 489 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

8.4% for88.8% against2.9% other11.2% against management491 filers0.8% for98.5% against0.6% other1.6% against management744,065,295 reported shares
5

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on DEI risks in federal contracting.

1,509 vote records from 491 filers. 20 of the 489 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.4% for95.7% against2.9% other4.1% against management491 filers0.4% for99.0% against0.6% other1.1% against management744,388,183 reported shares
6

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on healthcare coverage gaps.

1,496 vote records from 490 filers. 19 of the 488 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.0% for95.9% against3.1% other3.9% against management490 filers0.3% for99.0% against0.6% other1.1% against management743,973,392 reported shares
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

178 vote records from 22 filers. 5 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

13.6% for77.3% against9.1% other23.8% against management22 filers9.4% for90.5% against0.1% other40.6% against management5,361,626 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal5. Proposal6. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
NationwideForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst *Against *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
MFSForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForForForFor *AgainstAgainst
PIMCOForForForAgainstFor *Against
AllspringForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForAbstain or withhold *Against *For *AgainstAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *AgainstAgainst
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
American BeaconForForForAgainstFor *For *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Cohen & SteersNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Artisan PartnersForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Merck & Co., Inc. meeting?

2,131 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 26 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 111 of 2,063 voted against management (5.4%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Merck & Co., Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Merck & Co., Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Merck & Co., Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 26 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.