Home / Companies / Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. / 27 Jun 2024
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.: meeting of 27 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
200 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. meeting of 27 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
16 nominees; 80.3% of reported votes for; 164 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6,514 vote records from 200 filers. 6 of the 199 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
403 vote records from 197 filers. 1 of the 196 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
73 vote records from 24 filers. 1 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Amend Articles to Add Provision on Assessment of Clients' Climate Change Transition Plans
399 vote records from 197 filers. 36 of the 196 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Directors' Climate Change-Related Competencies
399 vote records from 197 filers. 69 of the 196 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | For * | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | Against * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against | For * |
| Principal | For | Against | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. meeting?
200 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Jun 2024. 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 27 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.