Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. / 12 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,021 filers reporting

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: meeting of 12 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,021 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. meeting of 12 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 92.0% of reported votes for; 71 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,407 vote records from 328 filers. 19 of the 325 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.0% for0.3% against6.7% other5.8% against management328 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,689 vote records from 1,011 filers. 81 of the 981 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 30 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.8% for7.9% against3.3% other8.3% against management1,011 filers97.3% for2.2% against0.4% other2.6% against management50,834,203 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

799 vote records from 326 filers. 5 of the 323 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.5% for1.2% against1.2% other1.5% against management326 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management22,856,502 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

807 vote records from 315 filers. 2 of the 312 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for1.0% against1.0% other0.6% against management315 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.3% against management22,955,831 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

24 vote records from 17 filers. 4 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

82.4% for17.6% against23.5% against management17 filers97.4% for2.6% against84.0% against management134,462 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Vote on a stockholder proposal to give shareholders the ability to call for a special shareholder meeting.

767 vote records from 312 filers. 215 of the 309 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

68.6% for30.1% against1.3% other69.6% against management312 filers55.2% for44.8% against0.0% other55.2% against management22,735,153 reported shares
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

4 vote records from 4 filers. 2 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for75.0% against25.0% other50.0% against management4 filers0.0% for92.9% against7.1% other63.3% against management2,361 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal
VanguardForForForFor *
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForFor *
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAbstain or withhold *ForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForFor *
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForFor *
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleAbstain or withhold *ForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForFor *
Global XForForForNo report
MFSForForForFor *
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForForForFor *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForFor *
VirtusForForForAgainst
VanEckForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
BairdForForForFor *
Artisan PartnersForForForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. meeting?

1,021 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 81 of 981 voted against management (8.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 12 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.