Home / Companies / Newell Brands Inc. / 8 May 2025
Newell Brands Inc.: meeting of 8 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
530 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Newell Brands Inc. meeting of 8 May 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 94.1% of reported votes for; 27 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,781 vote records from 149 filers. 2 of the 148 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
756 vote records from 525 filers. 107 of the 503 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
280 vote records from 143 filers. 2 of the 142 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
318 vote records from 154 filers. 13 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
A stockholder proposal to approve additional stock retention requirements for executives
302 vote records from 144 filers. 74 of the 142 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | No report | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | No report | For | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Newell Brands Inc. meeting?
530 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 107 of 503 voted against management (21.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Newell Brands Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Newell Brands Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Newell Brands Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.