Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Occidental Petroleum Corporation / 2 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,189 filers reporting

Occidental Petroleum Corporation: meeting of 2 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,189 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Occidental Petroleum Corporation meeting of 2 May 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 95.3% of reported votes for; 41 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

5,689 vote records from 248 filers. 3 of the 245 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.0% for0.8% against1.2% other1.2% against management248 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,685 vote records from 1,168 filers. 289 of the 1,129 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 39 filers reported this item without a management mark.

69.9% for25.2% against4.9% other25.6% against management1,168 filers93.5% for6.5% against0.0% other6.3% against management380,716,801 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

571 vote records from 246 filers. 5 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.2% for1.6% against1.2% other2.1% against management246 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management189,897,936 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

598 vote records from 255 filers. 12 of the 251 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.5% for5.1% against2.4% other4.8% against management255 filers97.5% for2.5% against0.0% other2.4% against management190,627,783 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management291,783 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *For
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForAgainst *For
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSNo reportForNo report
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForAgainst *Against *
DWSForForFor
PIMCONo reportForNo report
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VanEckForAgainst *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Dodge & CoxForForFor
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Occidental Petroleum Corporation meeting?

1,189 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 289 of 1,129 voted against management (25.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Occidental Petroleum Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Occidental Petroleum Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.