Home / Companies / Pagaya Technologies Ltd. / 9 Jun 2025
Pagaya Technologies Ltd.: meeting of 9 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
195 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Pagaya Technologies Ltd. meeting of 9 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 97.3% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
550 vote records from 67 filers. 2 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
275 vote records from 194 filers. 64 of the 185 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
110 vote records from 67 filers. 0 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
109 vote records from 66 filers. 9 of the 66 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For | No report |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | Against * | For | For |
| First Trust | No report | Against * | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | No report | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For |
| Allspring | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Pagaya Technologies Ltd. meeting?
195 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 64 of 185 voted against management (34.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Pagaya Technologies Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Pagaya Technologies Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Pagaya Technologies Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 9 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.