Vote Scores

Home / Companies / PAR Technology Corporation / 2 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025347 filers reporting

PAR Technology Corporation: meeting of 2 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

347 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the PAR Technology Corporation meeting of 2 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

7 nominees; 96.5% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,696 vote records from 133 filers. 2 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for0.0% against3.0% other1.5% against management133 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

509 vote records from 343 filers. 190 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

40.2% for55.7% against4.1% other57.6% against management343 filers76.6% for22.6% against0.7% other23.3% against management41,218,854 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 318 filers; for: 5 filers; three years: 4 filers; takenoaction: 1 filer; abstain: 1 filer; 1yr: 1 filer.

508 vote records from 343 filers. 5 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.5% for0.0% against98.5% other1.5% against management343 filers9.0% for0.1% against90.9% other1.0% against management41,293,717 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

240 vote records from 133 filers. 2 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for1.5% against1.5% other1.5% against management133 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management17,253,863 reported shares
5

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

217 vote records from 118 filers. 4 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.1% for1.7% against4.2% other3.4% against management118 filers98.3% for1.2% against0.5% other1.6% against management16,509,712 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

243 vote records from 127 filers. 13 of the 125 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.3% for8.7% against7.1% other10.4% against management127 filers94.1% for3.9% against2.0% other5.9% against management16,998,654 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
EquitableForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
First TrustForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
NationwideForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
BNY MellonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
PrincipalForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Hartford FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
DWSForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
AllspringForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
MassMutualForForSplit or no voteFor
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForSplit or no voteFor
Lord AbbettForForSplit or no voteFor
BairdNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the PAR Technology Corporation meeting?

347 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 190 of 330 voted against management (57.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by PAR Technology Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for PAR Technology Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing PAR Technology Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 2 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.