Home / Companies / Parkland Corporation / 6 May 2025
Parkland Corporation: meeting of 6 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
28 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Parkland Corporation meeting of 6 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 61.3% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
194 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
19 nominees; 78.8% of reported votes for; 4 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
173 vote records from 8 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
50 vote records from 25 filers. 7 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
20 vote records from 12 filers. 1 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
258 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES
9 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
6 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | For | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | No report | For * | No report | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Parkland Corporation meeting?
28 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 7 of 16 voted against management (43.8%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Parkland Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Parkland Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Parkland Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.