Home / Companies / PKO Bank Polski SA / 20 Jan 2026
PKO Bank Polski SA: meeting of 20 Jan 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
124 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the PKO Bank Polski SA meeting of 20 Jan 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 6 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
36 vote records from 7 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
2 nominees; 1.2% of reported votes for; 113 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
345 vote records from 119 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 119 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
455 vote records from 123 filers. 0 of the 118 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
132 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Approve Collective Suitability Assessment of Supervisory Board Members
195 vote records from 121 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 121 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Approve Decision on Covering Costs of Convocation of EGM
174 vote records from 106 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 106 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
42 vote records from 31 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 31 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
22 vote records from 18 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| American Century | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Invesco | No report | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | No report |
| Equitable | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Charles Schwab | No report | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Jackson National funds | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Thrivent | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Voya | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| First Trust | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Russell Investments | No report | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Nationwide | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Principal | No report | For | For | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | No report | Abstain or withhold |
| Hartford Funds | No report | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| PIMCO | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Harbor Funds | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| VanEck | No report | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| American Beacon | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the PKO Bank Polski SA meeting?
124 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 Jan 2026. 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by PKO Bank Polski SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for PKO Bank Polski SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing PKO Bank Polski SA with a meeting date within three days of 20 Jan 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.