Home / Companies / Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA / 10 Jan 2025
Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA: meeting of 10 Jan 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
69 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA meeting of 10 Jan 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 66 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
229 vote records from 68 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 68 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
238 vote records from 69 filers. 0 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
12 vote records from 5 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Approve Collective Suitability of Supervisory Board Members
114 vote records from 67 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 67 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Approve Decision on Covering Costs of Convocation of EGM
114 vote records from 67 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 67 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| State Street and SPDR | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | Split or no vote | Against | Against |
| Equitable | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold | Abstain or withhold |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA meeting?
69 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Jan 2025. 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA with a meeting date within three days of 10 Jan 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.