Home / Companies / Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. / 11 Jun 2026
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 11 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
160 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. meeting of 11 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 90.3% of reported votes for; 15 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
582 vote records from 55 filers. 3 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
233 vote records from 160 filers. 97 of the 148 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
97 vote records from 55 filers. 0 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
99 vote records from 55 filers. 21 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against * | No report |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | No report | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. meeting?
160 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 97 of 148 voted against management (65.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 11 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.