Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Quaker Houghton / 8 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024461 filers reporting

Quaker Houghton: meeting of 8 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

461 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Quaker Houghton meeting of 8 May 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 92.7% of reported votes for; 38 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,005 vote records from 172 filers. 6 of the 171 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

95.9% for2.9% against1.2% other3.5% against management172 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

677 vote records from 453 filers. 22 of the 440 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

92.3% for4.0% against3.8% other5.0% against management453 filers97.3% for2.7% against0.1% other2.7% against management15,703,137 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

334 vote records from 171 filers. 4 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.1% for1.8% against1.2% other2.4% against management171 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management7,917,766 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

341 vote records from 173 filers. 76 of the 172 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

54.3% for43.4% against2.3% other44.2% against management173 filers72.7% for22.9% against4.5% other27.3% against management7,921,790 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRAgainst *ForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForAgainst *For
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
PIMCONo reportForNo report
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
Lord AbbettForForFor
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Quaker Houghton meeting?

461 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 22 of 440 voted against management (5.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Quaker Houghton on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Quaker Houghton

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Quaker Houghton with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.