Home / Companies / Red Cat Holdings, Inc. / 18 Jun 2026
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 18 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
340 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Red Cat Holdings, Inc. meeting of 18 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 44.0% of reported votes for; 73 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
820 vote records from 94 filers. 56 of the 89 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
447 vote records from 336 filers. 169 of the 310 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
164 vote records from 94 filers. 1 of the 89 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
7 vote records from 5 filers. 2 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Invesco | No report | Against * | No report |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| First Trust | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | Against * | No report |
| Nationwide | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Red Cat Holdings, Inc. meeting?
340 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 169 of 310 voted against management (54.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Red Cat Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Red Cat Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.