Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Redwood Trust, Inc. / 19 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026312 filers reporting

Redwood Trust, Inc.: meeting of 19 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

312 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Redwood Trust, Inc. meeting of 19 May 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 90.0% of reported votes for; 11 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,424 vote records from 91 filers. 2 of the 90 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

95.6% for1.1% against3.3% other2.2% against management91 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

432 vote records from 309 filers. 13 of the 297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.6% for4.2% against4.2% other4.4% against management309 filers97.9% for2.0% against0.0% other1.2% against management96,160,366 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

178 vote records from 91 filers. 2 of the 90 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.8% for1.1% against1.1% other2.2% against management91 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.3% against management42,061,658 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

187 vote records from 93 filers. 4 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

95.7% for3.2% against1.1% other4.3% against management93 filers99.7% for0.3% against0.0% other0.5% against management42,020,411 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

8 vote records from 2 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other2 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalNo reportForNo report
State Street and SPDRForForFor
Franklin TempletonNo reportForNo report
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustNo reportForNo report
Russell InvestmentsNo reportForNo report
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
AllspringNo reportForNo report
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
VirtusForForFor
VanEckForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Redwood Trust, Inc. meeting?

312 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 19 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 13 of 297 voted against management (4.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Redwood Trust, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Redwood Trust, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Redwood Trust, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 19 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.