Home / Companies / Rithm Capital Corp. / 21 May 2026
Rithm Capital Corp.: meeting of 21 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
555 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Rithm Capital Corp. meeting of 21 May 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 83.4% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
558 vote records from 134 filers. 13 of the 130 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
772 vote records from 552 filers. 132 of the 515 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
279 vote records from 134 filers. 2 of the 130 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
294 vote records from 137 filers. 7 of the 132 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | No report | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | No report | For | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| MFS | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | For | For | For |
| PIMCO | For | For | For |
| Allspring | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Virtus | For | For | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Rithm Capital Corp. meeting?
555 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 132 of 515 voted against management (25.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Rithm Capital Corp. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Rithm Capital Corp.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Rithm Capital Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.