Vote Scores

Home / Companies / SharkNinja, Inc. / 18 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026604 filers reporting

SharkNinja, Inc.: meeting of 18 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

604 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SharkNinja, Inc. meeting of 18 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

7 nominees; 82.1% of reported votes for; 126 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,654 vote records from 189 filers. 1 of the 187 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.0% against1.6% other0.5% against management189 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

883 vote records from 599 filers. 113 of the 569 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 30 filers reported this item without a management mark.

74.6% for19.7% against5.7% other19.9% against management599 filers93.6% for6.2% against0.2% other6.3% against management80,354,231 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 510 filers; three years: 22 filers; for: 13 filers; 1-year: 7 filers; abstain: 4 filers; not applicable: 3 filers.

882 vote records from 590 filers. 24 of the 557 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2.0% for0.2% against97.8% other4.3% against management590 filers1.1% for0.2% against98.6% other1.3% against management79,816,688 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

380 vote records from 189 filers. 2 of the 188 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.0% against1.6% other1.1% against management189 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management28,050,121 reported shares
5

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

322 vote records from 159 filers. 3 of the 158 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.5% for1.3% against1.3% other1.9% against management159 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management25,472,517 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

58 vote records from 35 filers. 1 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

97.1% for2.9% against2.9% against management35 filers98.6% for1.4% against1.4% against management2,577,604 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalForAgainst *Split or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
SEIForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
VoyaForForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustForForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
NationwideForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalForForSplit or no voteFor
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
TransamericaForForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesForForSplit or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinForForSplit or no voteFor
Hartford FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
DWSForForSplit or no voteFor
AllspringForForSplit or no voteFor
MassMutualNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
VirtusForForSplit or no voteFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Janus HendersonForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Lord AbbettForForSplit or no voteFor
BairdNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the SharkNinja, Inc. meeting?

604 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 113 of 569 voted against management (19.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SharkNinja, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for SharkNinja, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SharkNinja, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.