Vote Scores

Home / Companies / SiTime Corporation

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXSITM · SEC company no. 1451809

SiTime Corporation

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
620year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
41.1%241 of 587 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
19.3%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
55.5% for39.1% against5.4% other41.1% against management616 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 620 funds and managers listed SiTime Corporation in their Form N-PX filings (one meeting).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 241 of the 587 filers that reported a position voted against management (41.1%), 34.5 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 19.3% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Among the largest fund families, 31 voted with management on pay and 20 voted against: BNY Mellon, DWS, American Century, Thrivent, Dimensional, American Beacon, Franklin Templeton and Victory Capital and others.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
29 May 2026year to 30 June 2026620341.1%
30 May 2025year to 30 June 2025454327.6%
30 May 2024year to 30 June 2024393328.7%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026SiTime CorporationMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management41.1%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management19.3%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 29 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalAgainst *
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyAgainst *
Franklin TempletonAgainst *
InvescoAgainst *
EquitableFor
Charles SchwabFor
Nuveen and TIAAFor
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *
J.P. MorganFor
Goldman SachsFor
WisdomTreeFor
PGIM and PrudentialFor
Jackson National fundsFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
SEIFor
T. Rowe PriceFor
ThriventAgainst *
Lincoln FinancialFor
VoyaFor
First TrustAgainst *
Russell InvestmentsFor
NationwideAgainst *
Victory CapitalAgainst *
Brighthouse FundsAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *
BNY MellonAgainst *
PrincipalFor
Pacific Life fundsFor
Global XFor
TransamericaFor
Federated HermesFor
AllianceBernsteinFor
Hartford FundsFor
DWSAgainst *
AllspringAgainst *
MassMutualFor
VanEckFor
Janus HendersonAgainst *
Neuberger BermanFor
American BeaconAgainst *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesFor
Lord AbbettFor
BairdAgainst *
Artisan PartnersAgainst *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202439428.7%23.2%
year to 30 June 202545527.6%12.8%
year to 30 June 202662041.1%19.3%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS3,16349.3%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2,20234.3%
AUDIT-RELATED1,05316.4%

Questions

How did large funds vote at SiTime Corporation?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 587 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at SiTime Corporation; 241 voted against management (41.1%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at SiTime Corporation?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which SiTime Corporation reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list SiTime Corporation, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.