Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. / 21 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025451 filers reporting

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.: meeting of 21 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

451 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. meeting of 21 May 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 95.9% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,959 vote records from 141 filers. 1 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.3% for0.0% against0.7% other0.7% against management141 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

612 vote records from 447 filers. 29 of the 431 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.7% for5.8% against4.5% other6.7% against management447 filers93.9% for2.7% against3.5% other2.7% against management69,844,372 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 404 filers; for: 9 filers; three years: 7 filers; abstain: 4 filers; 1-year: 3 filers; not applicable: 2 filers.

609 vote records from 445 filers. 12 of the 427 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.8% for0.2% against98.0% other2.8% against management445 filers3.1% for0.0% against96.9% other0.1% against management70,188,969 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

245 vote records from 141 filers. 5 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.5% for2.8% against0.7% other3.5% against management141 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.2% against management28,688,876 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityForForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalNo reportForSplit or no vote *No report
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyForForSplit or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
InvescoForForSplit or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForSplit or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForSplit or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no voteFor
Jackson National fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
SEIForForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteFor
ThriventForForSplit or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteFor
VoyaForForSplit or no voteFor
First TrustForForSplit or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsForForSplit or no voteFor
NationwideForForSplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalForForSplit or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForSplit or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalForForSplit or no voteFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XForForSplit or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
DWSForForSplit or no voteFor
PIMCONo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
AllspringNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
MassMutualNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Janus HendersonNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
American BeaconForForSplit or no voteFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
BairdNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. meeting?

451 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 29 of 431 voted against management (6.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.