Home / Companies / Tejon Ranch Co. / 13 May 2025
Tejon Ranch Co.: meeting of 13 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
193 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tejon Ranch Co. meeting of 13 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
20 nominees; 85.4% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,401 vote records from 69 filers. 3 of the 66 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
6 nominees; 8.5% of reported votes for; 48 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
631 vote records from 51 filers. 4 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
438 vote records from 188 filers. 123 of the 171 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
233 vote records from 69 filers. 0 of the 66 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
9 vote records from 5 filers. 5 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
132 vote records from 68 filers. 51 of the 65 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
100 vote records from 47 filers. 2 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 45 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Abstain or withhold | For | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | No report | For | For * | No report |
| Fidelity | For | Abstain or withhold | For | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Dimensional | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | Against | Split or no vote |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Abstain or withhold | For | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| American Century | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Invesco | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Equitable | For | For * | For | For | Against | Split or no vote |
| Charles Schwab | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | Against * | For | For * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For * | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | No report | Split or no vote * | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | Against | Split or no vote |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | Against * | For | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Abstain or withhold | For | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| SEI | For | No report | Against * | For | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | For * | Split or no vote |
| Voya | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Russell Investments | No report | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote * | Split or no vote | For * | Split or no vote |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| BNY Mellon | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Principal | No report | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| Global X | For | No report | Against * | For | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
| MassMutual | No report | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | No report | For | For | Against | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For | For * | Split or no vote |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Tejon Ranch Co. meeting?
193 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 123 of 171 voted against management (71.9%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tejon Ranch Co. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Tejon Ranch Co.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tejon Ranch Co. with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.