Home / Companies / TFS Financial Corporation / 22 Feb 2024
TFS Financial Corporation: meeting of 22 Feb 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
230 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the TFS Financial Corporation meeting of 22 Feb 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 53.7% of reported votes for; 56 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
474 vote records from 74 filers. 27 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
340 vote records from 226 filers. 173 of the 216 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
158 vote records from 74 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
4 vote records from 4 filers. 1 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against * | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Against * | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Against * | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | Against * | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | Against * | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | No report | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the TFS Financial Corporation meeting?
230 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 Feb 2024. On say-on-pay, 173 of 216 voted against management (80.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by TFS Financial Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for TFS Financial Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing TFS Financial Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 22 Feb 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.