Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Cato Corporation / 21 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 202654 filers reporting

The Cato Corporation: meeting of 21 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

54 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Cato Corporation meeting of 21 May 2026. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 21.0% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

132 vote records from 20 filers. 14 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

30.0% for0.0% against70.0% other70.0% against management20 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

103 vote records from 54 filers. 17 of the 53 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for29.6% against3.7% other32.1% against management54 filers75.0% for21.6% against3.5% other25.0% against management6,510,814 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

44 vote records from 20 filers. 2 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

90.0% for10.0% against10.0% against management20 filers96.7% for3.3% against3.3% against management1,528,472 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
State Street and SPDRNo reportForNo report
American CenturyAbstain or withhold *ForFor
EquitableForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAbstain or withhold *Against *For
PGIM and PrudentialAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Jackson National fundsAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Guggenheim and RydexAbstain or withhold *ForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Cato Corporation meeting?

54 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 17 of 53 voted against management (32.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Cato Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Cato Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Cato Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.