Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Progressive Corporation / 9 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,569 filers reporting

The Progressive Corporation: meeting of 9 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,569 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Progressive Corporation meeting of 9 May 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 94.5% of reported votes for; 65 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

13,220 vote records from 428 filers. 6 of the 423 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.2% for1.4% against1.4% other1.4% against management428 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

3,033 vote records from 1,541 filers. 93 of the 1,500 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 41 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.6% for6.2% against3.2% other6.2% against management1,541 filers95.5% for4.4% against0.1% other4.2% against management499,423,346 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,204 vote records from 424 filers. 8 of the 419 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.2% for1.7% against1.2% other1.9% against management424 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.3% against management192,042,825 reported shares
4

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

3 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2,958 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForForFor
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForAgainst *Against *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanForForFor
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Lord AbbettForForFor
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report
Artisan PartnersForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Progressive Corporation meeting?

1,569 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 93 of 1,500 voted against management (6.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Progressive Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Progressive Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Progressive Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 9 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.